BODDU JEEVAN DANIEL NOBLE v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/11444/2023 · 2025-03-05
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16420 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16420 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010218572023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 11444/2023 Between:
1. BODDU JEEVAN DANIEL NOBLE, S/O NOBLE, AGE 23 YEARS, STUDENT, R/O STATIONROAD, KAIKAL.URU VILLAGE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PRESENTLY ELURU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINIG VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FISHERIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINIG VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU DISTRICT. 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF FISHERIES BANDAR ROAD, PORANKI, VIJAYAWADA-521137 AP
5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, FISHERIES DEPARTMENT KAIKALURU, PRESENTLY ELURU DISTRICT,
6. THE FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MANDAVALLI, PRESENTLY ELURU,
7. THE TAHASILDAR AND MANDALR EVENUE OFFICER, MANDAVALLI MANDAL, PRESENTLY ELURU DISTRICT. 2
8. P A MELCHIZEDEK, S/O DEVADARAM, AGE 63 YEARS, RIO FLATNO 601,11 NO 8-3-20416, SRIKRISHNA RESIDENCY, VENGALRAONAGAR, HYDERABAD-500038
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B DEVADAS Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. GP FOR FISHERIES The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:
None for the Writ Petitioner. Heard Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader for Revenue representing Ld. Government Pleader for Fisheries. 2. It transpires from the record that except on the first date of admission i.e., on 02.05.2023, there is no appearance on behalf of the Writ Petitioner. However, Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader has drawn the attention of this Court to the Counter-Affidavit filed by the Respondent No.6 viz., the Fisheries Development Officer represented by the learned Asst. Government Pleader for Fisheries that the permission has been granted. 3. Para No.3 of the Counter-Affidavit is usefully extracted hereunder:
“In reply to Para Nos.4 & 5 of the petitioner’s affidavit, it is respectfully submitted that the Petitioner submitted representation for permission for Aquaculture as APSADA act 2020 through spandana. A reply was sent to Petitioner to apply through online for permission duly paying prescribed fee. Accordingly the Petitioner applied for permission vide Application No. AQNLFW00074434 dated 13-06-2023 through online and the authority has granted permission for Aquaculture as per APSADA act 2020.”
3
4. Having regard to the above extract, this Court is of the opinion that the grievance of the Writ Petitioner has been redressed by the Official Respondents and therefore, no further cause survives. 5.
Accordingly, the Writ Petitioner stands allowed. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 05.03.2025 Mnr
4
64
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION No.11444 OF 2023
Dt: 05.03.2025 Mnr