HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7732 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to set aside/quash entire proceeding of of case crime no. 290/2023 (State Versus Ram Sagar & others) pending in the Court of Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow, as well as the charge sheet No.1 dated 4.5.2024, under Sections 323, 504, 506. 308 1PC, of case crime no. 290/2023 Police Station Banthara. District Lucknow Pashchim (Commissionerate Lucknow), summoning order dated 9.9.2024 and the B.W. dated 8.7.2025 passed by Special Chief Judicial Magistrate. Lucknow, in the interest of justice. It is further prayed that during pendency of the instant petition the operation and implementation of the summoning order dated 9.9.2024 and the B.W. dated 8.7.2025, passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar as well as the further proceeding of case crime no. 290/2023 (State Versus Ram Sagar & others) pending in the Court of Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow, may kindly be stayed." 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Durga Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Sagar @ Sagar And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicants were not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed off accordingly. September 16, 2025 Mohd. Sharif A482 No. 7732 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench