- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3891 RFA No. 312 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 312 OF 2024 (PAR) BETWEEN: MISS BEENA D/O LATE NANJAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, NO. 383/2, 1ST STAGE, 4TH CROSS, 36TH MAIN, DOLLARS SCHEME, BTM LAY-OUT, MADIWALA, BANGALORE - 560 068. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. N.SURESHA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. VANAMALA.K.G. D/O LATE GOPALA REDDY.K.N., W/O NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 560, 17TH 'A', 1ST MAIN, KORAMANGALA, 6TH BLOCK, BENGALURU-560 095. 2. SMT R.SAROJAMMA W/O LATE GOPALA PEDDY.K.N., AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 323, NEW NO. 940/2, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND G MAIN, 8TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-56095. 3. SHANKARANARAYAN.K.G., S/O LATE GOPALA REDDY.K.N., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3891 RFA No. 312 of 2024 RESIDING AT NO. 323, NEW NO. 940/2, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND 'G', MAIN, 8TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-56095. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH.B.S., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Counsel for the appellant has appeared in person and submits that short accommodation may be granted to comply with the office objections. This Court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is simple. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before the Registrar (P & H) and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Thereafter, the appeal was listed before the Court on 13.01.2025, on that day, finally two week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the appeal was ordered to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections' on 28.01.2025 - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3891 RFA No. 312 of 2024 The appeal is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections'. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections are not complied with. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34