MAHTAB ALI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1288/2025 · 2025-09-19
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164111 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164111 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1288 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Ashutosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Maynak Sinha, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Shankar Lal Pandey, Advocate, who has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant, is taken on record. 2.The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicants on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 101 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333, 109(1) B.N.S, registered at Police Station- Raniganj, District- Pratapgarh.
3. After advancing submission at some length, the learned counsel for the applicants states that he does not want to press the instant application and seeks liberty to file an application for bail.
4. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicants to file an application for grant of bail and in case, such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 19, 2025 Preeti Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Mahtab Ali And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench