HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5449 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 and 2. 2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondents no.4 to 17 is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Additional Commissioner (Administration) Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the Appeal which is pending since 2024, in Case No.1959 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.C202404000001959) "Rajeshwar and another vs. Ram Milan and others", under Section 331(3) of U.P.Z.A.&L.R. Act, 1950, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Additional Commissioner (Administration) Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya considers and decides the aforesaid appeal in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach the court/ authority concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of the Appeal which is pending since 2024, in Case No.1959 of 2024 Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amrendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Ram Milan .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Administration, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) (Computerized Case No.C202404000001959) "Rajeshwar and another vs. Ram Milan and others", along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the court/authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioners, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. September 11, 2025 KR A227 No. 5449 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench