Sr. No. 82 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 98/2025 Ruksana Rashid and another …. Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. Rohit Kotwal, Advocate V/s UT of J&K and others …..Respondent(s) Through:- Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER 14.01.2025 1. Petitioners seek a direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to provide them the police protection as they apprehend danger to their lives from respondent Nos. 5 to 11. It is submitted that the petitioners are major and have married out of their own free will. Copies of Nikah Nama dated 02.12.2024 and proof of petitioners’ date of birth have been placed on record. They submit that since they have contracted the marriage against the wishes of respondent Nos. 5 to 11, as such, they are facing harassment at their hands. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the decision of the Supreme Court in Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and anr.; 2006 (5) SCC 475, and submits that in absence of there being any legal impediment, the petitioners are entitled to marry according to their choice and the official respondents are duty bound to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners. 3. Both the petitioners are present in Court and are identified by their counsel. 2 WP(C) No. 98/2025 4. Perusal of the record annexed with the writ file reveals that petitioners are major and have contracted marriage on 02.12.2024 according to Muslim Personal Law, Rites and Customs. 5. Any person having attained the age of majority is entitled to contract the marriage as per his/her wishes and the police department is duty bound to protect their life and liberty, if approached. However, it appears that the petitioners have not ever approached the official respondents for their indulgence in the matter for providing protection to them. 6. Keeping in view the relief sought for, this petition is disposed of, at this stage itself, by providing that respondent Nos. 1 to 4 shall look into the grievance of the petitioners for providing them adequate security and to ensure that nobody interferes in married life of the petitioners, if the petitioners approach them. It is made clear that no opinion has been expressed with regard to the validity of their marriage, and the police is free to take a view on the basis of the available material and inquiry. If it is found that the parties are major and have married out of their own free will and consent, the necessary protection shall be extended to them. 7. Disposed of. (MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) JUDGE Jammu 14.01.2025 Vishal