M/s Swathi Constructions, v. Sri Peeyush Kumar, IAS,
CC/3355/2025 · 2026-04-16
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1641 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1641 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HN, J
C.C.No.3355_2025 APHC010599062025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3355/2025 Between:
1. M/S SWATHI CONSTRUCTIONS,, REP BY MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRI VEMIREDDY REDDIAH, S/O. LATE VEERA REDDY, FLAT NO. 203,
VENKATADRI RESIDENCE, OPP PF OFFICE, YERRAMUKKAPALLLI, KADAPA,
YSR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI S SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MA AND UD, DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. SMT RAJAKUMARI GANIYA IAS, COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NANDYAL DISTRICT.
4. R RAMMOHAN REDDY, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH CIRCLE OFFICE ANANTHAPURAMU.
5. SRI S PRASAD GOUD, COMMISSIONER, DHONE MUNICIPALITY.
6. SRI Y RAGHU, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DHONE MUNICIPALITY.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
HN, J
C.C.No.3355_2025 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents for contempt of court for willful disobedience in violating the orders of the Honble High Court passed in W.P. No. 30192 of 2024 dated 01.09.2025 under the Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act to and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. L CHANDRA OBUL REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. GUDAPATI LAKSHMI NARAYANA
2. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI
HN, J
C.C.No.3355_2025 ORDER:
1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case. Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:17.04.2026 NKA
HN, J
C.C.No.3355_2025 264 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3355 of 2025 Date: 17.04.2026
NKA