HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9053 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. This petition has been filed with the following prayers :- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties no.2 and 3 to open the tender reference no.197/NPKHI/CMNSY/2025-26 dated 18.06.2025, tender ID 2025_ DOLBU1049969_1, tender title WARD No 1 Me NAHAR PATRI SADAK SE MOHAN KA PURWA GAUN TAK CC SAKAD KA NIRMAN KARYA, bid ID 5287730, which is at serial no.1, in the list of e-tender notification 18.06.2025, as contain in Annexure No. 1 & 2 to this writ petition. i. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to allot the tender to the petitioner on tender reference no.197/ NPKHI/CMNSY /2025-26 dated 18.06.2025, tender ID 2025_DOLBU_1049969_1, tender title WARD NO 1 ME NAHAR PATRI SADAK SE MOHAN KA PURWA GAUN TAK CC SADAK KA NIRMAN KARYA, bid ID 5287730, which is at serial no.1, in the list of e-tender not ification 18.06.2025." ii. 2. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of Nagar Panchayat, Khirauli, Suchitaganj, Ayodhya on the basis of instructions from the Executive Officer says that the e-tender was opened on 15.9.2025 and the petitioner was not found eligible for allotment. 3.The counsel for the petitioner prays that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 15.9.2025. 4.Learned counsel for the petitioner says that this writ petition was filed on 30.8.2025 after giving notice to Shri Surendra Kumar Singh who appears for opposite parties no.2 and 3. The Court had orally given time to the counsel for the respondents to seek instructions and after such oral directions the respondents have opened the tender and rejected the case of the petitioner arbitrarily. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Pratap Singh, Dilip Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Surendra Kumar Singh M/S Swanand Construction Thru. Proprietor Hari Shanker .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Counsel for the opposite parties no.2 and 3 dispute this contention and he also says that since rejection order was passed the petitioner needs to challenge it. 6. Instructions are kept on record. 7. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh. September 17, 2025 mks WRIC No. 9053 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench