1 APHC010217182020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 14301/2020 Between: Chavana Subbarayudu Naidu and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G JAGADEESWAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 ORDER:- 1. The petitioners claim that they were assigned lands in various survey numbers of Bavikadapalli Village, Thippayapalli Revenue Village, Pullampeta Mandal, YSR Kadapa District by the 4th respondent. 2. It is further case of the petitioner that at the instance of respondent Nos.5 to 9, the 4th respondent started interfering with their possession and directed the petitioners not to enter into the subject lands and they were not allowed to do agricultural activity. Since the 4th respondent continued to interfere with their possession without issuing notice, the present writ petition came to be filed. 3. On the other hand, the 4th respondent filed counter affidavit stating that the respondent 5 to 9 have filed a representation dated 03.08.2020 claiming right over the lands in question. In view of the rival claims over the lands in dispute, the 4th respondent instructed the petitioners not to enter into the subject lands. 4. The counter affidavit further states that the respondent Nos.5 to 9 did not file any documentary proof in 3 support of their claim. On the contrary, the petitioners filed copies of D-form patta, pattadar pass books, title deeds and adangals in respect of their claim. 5. It is further averred in the counter affidavit that the 4th respondent denied the alleged interference by him over the lands in dispute at the instance of respondent Nos.5 to 9. 6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. Despite service of notice on respondent Nos.5 to 9 none appeared. 7. While ordering the notice this Court on 18.08.2020 directed the parties to maintain statu-quo existing as on that date. The said interim order is subsisting till today. 8. On perusal of the counter affidavit, the 4th respondent admitted that the DKT pattas were issued in favour of the petitioners. Further the counter affidavit reveals that the respondent Nos.5 to 9 did not place any documentary evidence in respect of their claim over the lands in dispute. Though initially the 4th respondent instructed the petitioners not to enter into the subject lands and after passing interim order they did not interfere with the possession of the petitioner. 4 9. In view of the same, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner except in accordance with law. 10. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 21.03.2025 DR 5 297 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR WP No.14301 of 2020 Date 21.03.2025 DR