JYATIMA DEVI v. NAYAB TEHSILDAR, BHIYAWN, TAHSIL JALALPUR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND ANOTHER
A227/5456/2025 · 2025-09-11
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164064 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164064 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5456 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondent no.2 is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Nayab Tehsildar, Bhiyawn, Tehsil Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar to decide the Case No.8520 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.T-202404040208520) "Jyatima Devi versus Samharu", under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Nayab Tehsildar, Bhiyawn, Tehsil Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Nayab Tehsildar, Bhiyawn, Tehsil Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar is directed to decide the Case No.8520 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.T-202404040208520) "Jyatima Devi versus Samharu", under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vishal Kumar Yadav, Vijay Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Jyatima Devi .....Petitioner(s) Nayab Tehsildar, Bhiyawn, Tahsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar And Another .....Respondent(s)
expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 11, 2025 KR A227 No. 5456 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench