BANAI SINGH MEENA SON OF SHRI MARDHAN SINGH MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/6088/2025 · 2025-04-24
Sudesh Bansal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16404 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16404 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:17396] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6088/2025 Banai Singh Meena Son Of Shri Mardhan Singh Meena, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Village Pichumar, Deeg, Kumher, Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. The Director Secondary Education, Bikaner (Raj.)
3. The Joint Director, Secondary Education Department, Bharatpur, Division Churu (Raj.)
4. District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Head Quarter Deeg, Bharatpur (Raj.)
5. Principal, Government Senior Secondary School Usrani, Kumher, Deeg, Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat for Ms. Komal Kumari Giri For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 24/04/2025
1. Petitioner has invoked writ jurisdiction of High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, assailing his transfer order dated 12.04.2025 from the post of Vice- principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Usrani to the post of Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Okatiya Bera, Kishornagar, Jodhpur, fundamentally on the ground that petitioner joined at the present place on 25.01.2025 itself and his retirement has also been declared w.e.f. 30.06.2025 on attaining superannuation age
[2025:RJ-JP:17396] (2 of 2) [CW-6088/2025] of 60 years, therefore in such circumstances, it has been prayed that his transfer order deserves to be stayed.
2. Though, the petitioner has a strong case on merits, however, since the petitioner has a statutory and alternative remedy to file an appeal against the impugned transfer order before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal (for short “the Tribunal”), hence, counsel for petitioner prays for and is granted permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file an appeal against the transfer order before the Tribunal.
3. It is hereby observed that in case, an appeal is filed within a period of 15 days’ from today, the Tribunal is expected to grant expeditious hearing on the appeal as also on the stay application, considering the issue involved in the matter.
4. With the aforesaid observation/ liberty, instant writ petition stands disposed of.
5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/22