Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16404 (GAU)

ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. AAMENA BEGUM AND 6 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/2402/2025 · 2025-07-31

Parthivjyoti Saikia

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010161182025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2402/2025 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT ORIENTAL HOUSE A 25/27 ASAF ALI ROAD, NEW DELHI 110002 AND REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI 7, REPRESENTED BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER. VERSUS AAMENA BEGUM AND 6 ORS W/O LATE SAIDUL BASHER @ SAIDUL BASAR, 2:SADIKUL ISLAM S/O LATE SAIDUL BASHER @ SAIDUL BASAR BOTH ARE R/O VILL. BORGHAT P.O. KHALIHAMARI P.S. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM PIN 784026 3:MD. HUSSAIN AHMED S/O MANSUR ALI R/O DIGHALDHARI P.O. AND P.S. DOKMOKA DIST. KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN 782441 4:SAJID ALOM S/O ABDUL ROHIM R/O VILL. NO. 3 SARTHEY GAON Page No.# 2/3 P.O. NAKHUTI P.S. LUMDING DIST. HOJAI ASSAM PIN 782447 5:ANJUMA BEGUM D/O LATE SAIDUL BASHER @ SAIDUL BASAR R/O VILL. BORGHAT P.O. KHALIHAMRI P.S. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM PIN 784026 6:AMINUL HAQUE S/O LATE SAIDUL BASHER @ SAIDUL BASAR R/O VILL. BORGHAT P.O. KHALIHAMARI P.S. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM PIN 784026 7:THE BRANCH MANAGER THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. MAIN ROAD TEZPUR P.O. AND P.S. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM PIN 78402 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SISHIR DUTTA, S K BEGUM,MS. M CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : MAC App./9216/2025 (Filing Number) ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ASSAM VERSUS AAMENA BEGUM AND ORS Page No.# 3/3 ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MAMANI CHOUDHURY Advocate for : appearing for AAMENA BEGUM AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 01.08.2025 Heard Ms. M Choudhury, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the applicant. 2. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 24 days in filing the connected MAC Appeal. 3. I have found that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. 4. At this stage, going for issue of notice to the respondents would be nothing but sheer wastage of time. 5. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. 6. The connected appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The IA stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant