IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AM THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUN TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 584 OF 2010 Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. Calender and Judgment dt.08-12-2009 passed by the court of the Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Palakol, West Godavari District to the extent of imposing maximum sentence as stipulated under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in S.T.C No.5 of 2006 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Palakol, West Godavari District. Between: against the not Medapati Ramachandra Reddy, S/o. Raja Reddy, Aged 52 years, Male, Hindu, Agriculture, Kavitham Village, Poduru Police Station Limits, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner/Complainant AND 1. Likhilhapudi Bhaskar @ L.V.V.Bhaskar Rao, S/o. Joseph, 54 years, Hindu, MIG 71, Housing Board Coiony, Palakol, West Godavari District. ...Respondent/Accused 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the ^Public Prosecutor, Courtof Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. High ...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri P Durga Prasad Counsel for the Respondent No.1: None appeared Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Public Prosecutor The Court made the following: AF5^^P^l^?Clia 't IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] 3 THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 584/2010 Between: ...PETITIONER Medapati Ramachandra Reddy AND ...RESPONDENT(S) Likhithapudi Bhaskar L.V.V Bhaskar Rao and others Counsel for the Petitioner: P. Durga Prasad Counsel for the Respondent(S): Public Prosecutor The Court made the following: ORDER: Mr Allu Harinarayana, learned counsel representing Sri P. Durga Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the 1 St St In view of the fact that the 1 respondent/accused is no more, respondent/accused is no more, nothing remains in this criminal revision case for further adjudication and it is liable to be dismissed as abated. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as abated. There 2. shall be no order as to costs. \ 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.584 of 2010 Dated 19.06.2025 r, As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand 1 closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Judicial Magistrate of I Class: Palakol, West Godavari District. (With Records) 2. One CC to Sri P Durga Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CC's to The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] 4. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 5. Two CD Copies Sam RAM \ v: - HIGH COURT DATED; 19/06/2025 ORDER CRLRC.No.584 of 2010 5^, 10 SEP 2025 m i3 ^ . Current Section DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS ABATED