Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 164022 (ALL)

RAJU SINGH @ RAJU SINGH KUSHWAHA AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/7650/2025 · 2025-09-15

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7650 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of the B.N.S.S. has been filed with the prayer to quash the charge-sheet no.01 dated 09.08.2021 filed in Crime No.0091/2021, under Sections 406/504/506 IPC lodged at Police Station PGI, District Lucknow, to quash the proceedings of Criminal Case No.25124/2022 (State Vs. Raju Singh and others), pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow and to quash the orders dated 24.03.2022 and 10.08.2023 passed in the aforesaid case by means of which the applicants were summoned and thereafter non-bailable warrants were issued against them. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and were never involved in committing the offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. He added that due to enmity, their names have been planted in the first information report and thereafter they have been charge-sheeted. He next added that due to unavoidable circumstances, they could not appear before the trial below. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avinash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raju Singh @ Raju Singh Kushwaha And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties', it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed of accordingly. September 15, 2025 MVS/- A482 No. 7650 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench