PANKAJ KUMAR @ PANKAJ KUMAR MISHRA v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND OTHERS
/5475/2025 · 2025-09-12
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164018 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164018 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5475 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Onkar Nath Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar, to decide interim relief application pending in Revision No. 1545 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. 5404400000049) - Raj Kumari & Others Vs. Niraj Vikram Singh and Others, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar, is directed to decide interim relief application pending in Revision No. 1545 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. 5404400000049) - Raj Kumari & Others Vs. Niraj Vikram Singh and Others, expeditiously, say within a period of six week from the date of receipt of service report of service upon opposite parties therein, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
September 12, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Onkar Nath Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench