Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 164001 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR GUPTA @ GUDDAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/1004/2025 · 2025-09-15

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1004 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2.The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 800 of 2018, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C and 3/7 of Essential Commodities Act, registered at Police Station- Kotwali Sadar, District- Lakhimpur Kheri. 3. After advancing submission at some length, the learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the instant application and seeks liberty to file an application for bail. 4. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for grant of bail and in case, such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 15, 2025 Preeti. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Divyanshu Tripathi, Aman Kumar Shrivastav Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Ajay Kumar Gupta @ Guddan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench