SRI SAI ENGINEERING WORKS v. BUDITHI RAJASEKHAR, IAS
CC/1131/2025 · 2025-07-17
V Sujatha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16400 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16400 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010216792025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1131/2025 Between:
1. SRI SAI ENGINEERING WORKS, R.S. NO.266 264, OPP MOTHER VANNINI HOSPITAL, K.N.ROAD , TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI, ANDHRA PRADESH. REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR, KANDULA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O KANDULA JAGANNADHA RAO, HINDU, AGED 56 YEARS, R/O 1-86-10, LIG - 1-205, A.P.H.B COLONY, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI,
ANDHRA PRADESH - 534101. ...PETITIONER AND
1. BUDITHI RAJASEKHAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
3. SRI DILLI RAO I A S, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, OLD MIRCHI YARD, NALLAPADU ROAD, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may
2
be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for willfully, wantonly, deliberately, violating and not implementing the orders of the Hon'ble High Court passed in W.P. No. 7995 of 2024 dated 24.04.2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DASARI S V V S V PRASAD Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.7995 of 2024 on 24.04.2024, wherein this Court passed the following order:
“….In view of the above, though the amount claimed by the petitioner is Rs.8,73,150/-, but, however, as the amount admitted by the respondents is only Rs.8,20,350/- , the learned counsel for the petitioner requested to dispose of the writ petition. Hence, this Court feels it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondents to pay the admitted amount of Rs.8,20,350/- (Rupees Eight lakhs twenty thousand three hundred and fifty only) to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (4) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, the petitioner is at liberty to claim for the balance amount, if any, payable to him.”
2.
Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel representing the respondents has furnished a letter dated 17.07.2025, addressed by the Director of Agriculture, Andhra Pradesh, Guntur, to the Government Pleader for Agriculture, wherein it is mentioned that the amount of Rs.8,20,350/- payable to the petitioner has been credited to the petitioner’s Account No.1424280000000026 on 17.07.2025. 3. Recording the same, as the amount has already been credited to the petitioner’s account, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 18.07.2025 JLV