SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS ABA No.110 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. A.S. Rawat, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Divya Jain, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Arvind Vashistha, learned Senior Advocate (appeared through V.C.) assisted by Ms. Kavya Mehrishi, learned counsel for the informant. 4. The present anticipatory bail application is arising out of FIR No.0019 of 2025, dated 25.01.2025, under Sections 120-B, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of IPC, registered at P.S. Bansant Vihar, District Dehradun. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. It is argued by learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicant that the present FIR lodged against the applicant is a counter-blast of another FIR lodged by Vinod Uniyal against the informant Arjun Sharma, and his family members, being FIR No.64 of 2023, registered at P.S. Rajpur Road, Dehradun, in order to usurp the property, the present FIR has been lodged, in which, the applicant has falsely been booked. He further submits that since the co-accused in connection with the aforesaid case has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court on 04.02.2025 in ABA No.102 of 2025, therefore, he prays for the parity. He also submits that when the FIR was lodged by the son against his mother, it is all more important to release the mother on anticipatory bail as there is some property dispute between the parties. 7. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents opposed the anticipatory bail application by arguing that the applicant has been named in the FIR, and there are serious 2 allegations against the applicant. 8. Having regard the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly applicant being mother of informant, applicant-Smt. Veena Sharma is directed to be released on Anticipatory Bail, in the event of her arrest, on furnishing her personal bond of Rs.30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the I.O. concerned, on the following conditions:- “(i) Applicant shall attend the Trial Court regularly and she shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment; (ii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case; (iii) Applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Trial Court. 9. It is clarified that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon her, the concerned authority will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail. 10. Anticipatory Bail Application (No.110 of 2025) stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) Vacation Judge 06.02.2025 AK