Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1640 (HP)

LAC, NHPC v. NARAIN SINGH AND ORS

CMP/29496/2025 · 2026-03-09

Sushil Kukreja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Collector Land Acquisition, NHPC Ltd. Vs. Narain Singh & Ors. CMPs No. 29496/2025 & CMP No. 3801/2026 in RFA No. 254/2012 09.03.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the non-applicants/appellants. Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advocate, vice Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the applicants/respondents. CMP No. 3801/2026 The present application under Order 1, Rule 10 CPC has been filed by the applicants for impleading them as party respondents in the present proceedings. As per the applicants, respondent No. 2, Dina Nath, has expired on 04.11.2015 and one of his legal heir, i.e. respondent No. 2(d), Hukami Devi, has also expired on 06.02.2017. On 24.11.2017, respondent No. 4, Revati Ram has also expired. Therefore, it is prayed that the applicants being legal representatives of aforesaid respondents be impleaded as party respondents in the present proceedings. The application (CMP No. 29496/2025) is duly supported by the affidavits of all the applicants, death certificates of the deceased as well as their legal heirs certificates. Learned counsel for the non- applicants/appellants, under telephonic instructions ….2... received, states that she has no objection in case the application is allowed. Having perused the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and the applicants are impleaded as party respondents and shall now figure as respondents No. 2(d)(i) to 2(d)(vi) and 4(i) to 4(v). Amended memo of parties already on record. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 29496/2025 The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of the applicants/respondents, for release of the award amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported by the affidavits of all the applicants. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned counsel for the non- applicants/appellants, under telephonic instructions received, has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as the award has attained finality and no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court. ...3... Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavits of all the applicants, coupled with the fact that the award has attained finality, as till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court, the same is allowed and the amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to- date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of the applicants/respondents, as per their respective shares, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to their bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned at para-4 of the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 9th March, 2026 (raman)