Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163975 (ALL)

VINAY KUMAR MALL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/10555/2025 · 2025-09-11

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10555 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to consider petitioner's transfer to Gorakhpur in view of the fact that petitioner is due to superannuate within a period of eight months and therefore, petitioner's case is covered by paragraph-5(v) of the Government Order dated 06.05.2025. 3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the opposite party no.2 i.e. Director General, Medical and Health Service, Swasthya Bhawan, Lucknow who shall consider and decide the same within a period of two weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 4. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 11, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virijendra Kumar Singh, Amit Kumar Singh, Naveen Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Vinay Kumar Mall .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical And Health Services Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench