Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16397 (RAJ)

AKHIL BHARTIYA VIDYARTHI PARISHAD (ABVP) v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

WMAP/72/2025 · 2025-05-09

Inderjeet Singh, Pramil Kumar Mathur

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:19567-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 72/2025 In D.B. Civil (PIL) Writ Petition NO.2487/2022 Akhil Bhartiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), Through Its National Secretary, Hushyar Singh Meena Off- Vidyarthi Bhavan Janta Colony, Jaipur, Rajasthan Presently Through Its State Secretary, Akhil Bhartiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), Jaipur, Rajasthan, Abhinav Singh S/o Ghanshyam Singh Aged About 28 Years, R/o Saipau Road, 185/186, Sardar Dara Singh Nagar, Dhaulpur, Rajasthan-328001. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Board Of Secondary Education, Rajasthan Through Its Chairman, Police Line, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. The Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Secretariat Jaipur. 4. Central Bureau Of Investigation, 1, Tilak Marg, C Scheme, Jaipur 5. Rajiv Gandhi Study Circle, Through Its Chairman Sh. Ashok Gehlot, 49, Civil Lines, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhawani S. Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 09/05/2025 Heard on the application (IA No.1/2025) under Order 41 Rule 27 of CPC for taking documents on record. [2025:RJ-JP:19567-DB] (2 of 2) [WMAP-72/2025] For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the documents are taken on record. D.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 72/2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the counsel for the original petitioner was appointed as Deputy Government Advocate vide order dated 14.06.2024, therefore he was unable to appear before this Court on the date of passing of the order dated 27.03.2025 and prayed for recalling of the order. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has not disputed this fact. 4. In that view of the matter, we deem it just and proper to recall the order dated 27.03.2025 and the said order is recalled. 5. The writ petition is restored to its original number. 6. The application stands disposed of. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Sunita/3