IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15244 of 2017 ====================================================== Brajesh Nandan Bhaskar Son of Late Raghunandan Prasad Singh, Resident of Sahban Mohalla, Maranga Road, P.S.- K. Hat and District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar and Ors 2. Collector, Purnea. 3. D.C.L.R. Sadar Purnea. 4. S.D.O. Sadar Purnea. 5. Anchal Adhikari C.O. Purnea East. 6. Md. Anwar, Son of Md. Sahin, R/o Azad Nagar, Madhepura, P.s.- K. Hat and Dist- Purnea. 7. Md. Habibur Rahman, Son of Late Asmat Ali, 8. Bibi Tamanna Tabassum, W/o Habibur Rahman, Both resident of Village- Habka, P.S.- Degarua Distt- Purnea. 9. Md. Shahbaz, 10. Md. Shahnawaz, Both S/o Imamuddin and R/o Village- Gyandev, P.S.- Amour, P.S.- Amour and Distt- Purnea. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Abu Shajar, Adv. Mr. Mohammed Abu Haidar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md.Khurshid Alam -Aag12 For the Resp. 6 to 10 : Mr. Shanti Pratap, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 5 17-06-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been preferred for: issuance of an appropriate writ and or direction, commanding the respondent- concerned to restrain the respondents 6 to 10 from making any construction and changing the nature of the land as well as restraning said the respondents from issuing rent receipts in favour of the respondent nos. 7 to 10 and from Patna High Court CWJC No.15244 of 2017(5) dt.17-06-2025 2/2 interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioner and others who have been coming in peaceful possession over the land in question which has also been confirmed with the order dated 01.03.2013 passed by the learned DC.L.R Sadar, Purnea in Mutation Appeal no.18 of 2007-08 by setting aside the order dt. 03.08.07 passed by the respon dent-Anchal adhikari in Mutation case no. 931 U of 07-08 and allowed the appeal filed by the petitioner and others against which, the respondent no.6 has al ready filed Mutation Revision no. 37 of 2013 khs to the Respondent- Collector, Purnea, which is pending for the disposal and as such till disposal of the said Revision case, the respondent no.6 to 10 also be restrained from interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioner and others over the land in question. 3. In the presence of Mr. Shanti Pratap, learned counsel representing the respondent nos. 6 to 10, Md. Abu Shajar submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition. 4. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U