Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010091042025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5435/2021 BASANTI KUMSING W/O LATE NAHUM JAZOWAR C/O LOKOPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH TEZPUR 784001 DIST SONITPUR ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE NEW DELHI 2:THE DIRECTOR LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH TEZPUR 784001 DIST SONITPUR ASSAM 3:THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH TEZPUR Page No.# 2/3 784001 DIST SONITPUR ASSAM 4:THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL (CAG) OF INDIA DEEN DAYAL UPADHYAYA MARG NEW DELHI 110124 ------------ Advocate for : MR B D DAS Advocate for : ASSTT.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER 13.05.2025 Heard Ms. K. L. R. Yanthan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. S. C. Biswas, learned counsel for the writ petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. S. Roy, learned Central Govt. Counsel appearing for the Union of India. It is submitted at the Bar that the issues involved in this writ petition have already been conclusively adjudicated by a coordinate Bench of this Court by the judgment and order dated 13.09.2022 passed in WP(C) No.258/2022 and the batch of connected writ petitions and the Division Bench has also affirmed the said judgment by the judgment and order dated 24.04.2025 passed in Writ Appeal No.132/2025 preferred by the Union of India and its officials as appellants. In that view of the matter, nothing further survives for adjudication in this writ petition. Since there is consensus at the Bar that the issues raised in the writ petition are covered by the judgment and order dated 13.09.2022 passed in WP(C) No.258/2022 and the batch of connected writ petitions as affirmed by the judgment and order dated 24.04.2025 passed by the Division Bench in Writ Page No.# 3/3 Appeal No.132/2025, the matter stands closed by clarifying that the relief prayed for in the writ petition shall be covered by the aforesaid judgments. JUDGE Comparing Assistant