SHAZIEA SIDDIQUI ALIAS SHAJIYA SIDDQE v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
CRLR/207/2025 · 2025-11-19
Ashish Naithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16396 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16396 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Dat e Of f ice Not es, r epor t s, or ders or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
CRLR No. 207 of 2025 Hon ’ble Ash ish Nait h an i, J.
Mr. Mukesh Rawat, learned counsel for the Revisionist.
2. Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Instant Criminal Revision has been filed by the Revisionist seeking the release of her vehicle and for quashing and setting aside the order dated 12.02.2025, passed by the learned Special Judge (NDPS Act)/First Additional District and Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar in Misc. Criminal Case No. 480 of 2024, State vs. Shajiya Siddiqui, arising out of offences punishable under Sections 8/21/60 of the NDPS Act, Police Station Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. By the impugned order, the learned Special Judge (NDPS) has rejected the application filed by the Revisionist for release of her vehicle- Scooty bearing Registration No. UK 18 T 0883, Chassis No.
MD626AK36R3K05153, Engine No. AK3KR3202607.
4. In the present case, the FIR was registered on the basis of routine checking conducted by the police on 18.11.2024 within the jurisdiction of Police Station Kashipur. During vehicle checking, the police party allegedly intercepted a scooter, and upon search, allegedly recovered certain items which, according to them, were of suspicious or illegal nature.
5.
Learned counsel for the Revisionist submits that the Revisionist had no knowledge of the alleged offence. It is contended that she has not committed any crime and that the vehicle was being used by her husband without her knowledge. There is no independent witness to the incident, which creates doubt over the prosecution story. It is further submitted that the
vehicle in question belongs to her husband- Mohsin.
6. Learned State Counsel fairly concedes that the said vehicle belongs to her husband- Mohsin.
7. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the instant Criminal Revision stands disposed of. The vehicle in question is directed to be released in favour of the Revisionist upon her furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/-, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. The release shall be subject to the condition that the vehicle shall not be transferred, mortgaged, sold, or altered in its nature or condition in any manner whatsoever. The Revisionist shall also furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the court concerned or before any other authority as may be
directed by the Court.
( Ash ish Nait h an i, J.) 1 9 .1 1 .2 0 2 5 Shiksha SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa08b09c12f21822fbd4 0bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF0A9BED00E67B5283D 205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2025.11.19 17:00:44 +05'30'