Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16394 (KAR)

SHRI PAVAN v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/3676/2025 · 2025-02-07

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5695 WP No. 3676 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 3676 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI PAVAN AGE ABOUT 24 YEARS S/O.BYLAPPA R/AT, NO. 28, PRIYADARSHINI BADAVANE, PALANAJOGIHALLI, MALLATHAHALLI POST, KASABAHOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU 561 203 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHRIRAMA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY AMBEDKAR VIDHI VIDHANA SOUDHA 560001 BY AGA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE 560001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BEERASANDRA BANGALORE RURAL – 561203 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISON BANGALORE RURAL Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5695 WP No. 3676 of 2025 4. SMT. MUNIYAMMMA W/O. LATE HANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/AT, GOWDAHALLI VILLAGE, MADHUR HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 561 203 5. SHRI V. SRINIVAS S/O, LATE VENKATESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT, GOWDAHALLI VILLAGE, MADHUR HOBLI, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU - 561 203 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SESHU.V., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TO CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OF THE APPEAL BEARING NO. SCA APPEAL NO. 2/2025 FILED BY THE PETITIONER DTD. 27.01.2025 AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE R-3 ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER WITHIN REASONABLE TIME FIXED BY THIS HONBLE COURT VIDE ANNX-K. AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5695 WP No. 3676 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 07.02.2025 stating that the 2nd respondent-Deputy Commissioner has passed an order yesterday and therefore, the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL