Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16393 (KAR)

SRI. VINOD PARASRAM RAMNANI v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WP/3548/2020 · 2025-01-10

Jyoti Mulimani

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1045 WP No. 3548 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 3548 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. VINOD PARASRAM RAMNANI S/O PARASRAM RAMNANI, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, NO.115, KASAVANAHALLI, SARJAPUR ROAD, VARTHUR, BENGALURU-35. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JEEVAN., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KIRAN.J., ADVOCATE) AND: CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ANTI CORRUPTION BRANCH, NO.36, BELLARY ROAD, GANGA NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032. REPRESENTED BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. P.PRASANNA KUMAR., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1045 WP No. 3548 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Sri.Jeevan., counsel on behalf of Sri.Kiran.J., for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken by advocate on record and the petitioner about infructuous of the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 3 Sl No.: 31