Sri Seetha Rama Swami Registered Charitable Trust v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/14260/2020 · 2025-09-09
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16391 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16391 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010216362020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14260/2020 Between:
1. SRI SEETHA RAMA SWAMI REGISTERED CHARITABLE TRUST, , REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN, BOMMI PRABHAKARA RAO S/O SURYANARAYANA AGE 60 YEAR R/O SATYAVOLU VILLAGE, PEDAPADU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU,WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEDAPADU, PEDAPADU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
5. GANTA PRASAD RAO, S/O. RANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. SATYAVOLU VILLAGE, PEDAPADU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
6. GANTA RAMOHAN, S/O APPALSWAMY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. SATYAVOLU VILLAGE, PEDAPADU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
7. KUNUKU VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. SIMHACHALAM, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. SATYAVOLU VILLAGE, PEDAPADU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
8. BETALA LOVEKUMAR, S/O. ARJUNARAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O. SATYAVOLU VILLAGE, PEDAPADU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 4 in not registering case pursuant to the Petitioner complaint dated 18-07-2020, through RPAD against the respondents 5 to 8 is illegal arbitrary and further direct the Respondents 1 to 4 to give protection to petitioners trust from Respondents No.5 to 8, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.4 to enquire and register a case against the Respondents No.5 to 8, pursuant to petitioner compliant dated 18-07-2020, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V V PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. P B NARASIMHA MURTY
3. C SUBODH The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14260 of 2020
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue a Writ Order particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No 4 in not registering case pursuant to the Petitioner complaint dated 18072020 through RPAD against the respondents 5 to 8 is illegal arbitrary and further direct the Respondents 1 to 4 to give protection to petitioners trust from Respondents 5 to 8 and to pass.…”
2. Heard Sri V.V.Prabhakar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that aggrieved by the action of police in not registering case against the unofficial respondents pursuant to the complaint given by the petitioner on 18.07.2020, the present writ petition is filed.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that on the complaint of the petitioner, a crime in Crime No.181 of 2020 has been registered against the unofficial respondents at Pedapadu Police Station and during the course of investigation, it is found that the complaint made by the petitioner is false and accordingly, the said crime has been
disposed as false. He further submitted that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
5. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________
Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
Date: 10th September, 2025
RKS