Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1639 (UTT)

VISHAL GAUR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/73/2024 · 2025-05-09

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.73 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Rajendra Arya, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Mr. Arvind Vashistha, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Rachit Manglik, Advocate for respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions, submits that after investigation charge sheet has been submitted on 20.03.2025 against the petitioners. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition has rendered infructuous, however it is open to the petitioners to challenge the charge sheet before appropriate forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 09.05.2025 SK