ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/8646/2025 · 2025-09-12
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163890 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163890 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8646 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.
1. Shri Kamal Kishore Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the bail application.
2. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh petition.
3. Office is directed to return certified copy of the documents filed along with bail application to learned counsel for the applicant. September 12, 2025 R.C. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kamal Kishor Tiwari, Ankit Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Anil Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench