HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10527 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Birendra Prasad Singh, Advocate who files his vakalatnama on behalf of the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. Contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having been placed under suspension vide order dated 29.11.2022, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, on account of being incarcerated in jail and even though subsequent thereto the petitioner has been bailed out, the respondents have failed to consider reinstatement of the petitioner and hence the petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.2 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.2 then the respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shishir Chandra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shireesh Kumar Shanti Prasad .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Co-Operative Federation Ltd. Lko. Thru. Managing Director And Another .....Respondent(s) With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. September 10, 2025 prateek WRIA No. 10527 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench