[2025:RJ-JP:23356] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5404/2025 Fateh Singh S/o Sh. Ramprasad, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Davich, Police Station Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.) Order 19/06/2025 1. The accused-Petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.199/2024 registered with the Police Station, Indragarh, District Bundi for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) & 110 of B.N.S., 2023 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. 4. The allegation as has been levelled against the accused- petitioner is of causing injuries to the complainant/injured- Banwari by a blunt weapon. As per the Medico Legal Report, the injuries sustained by the complainant/injured- Banwari are found to be simple in nature by a blunt weapon. [2025:RJ-JP:23356] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5404/2025] 5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner so also the fact that all the injuries attributed to the accused-petitioner are simple in nature by a blunt weapon, this Court deems just and proper to grant the indulgence of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Indragarh, District Bundi in F.I.R. No. 199/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (I). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J ARTI SHARMA /78