Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163842 (ALL)

MUHMMAD WASEEM AHMAD v. THE ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ROOM NO. 31 LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/8987/2025 · 2025-09-12

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8987 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging an order passed under section 14 of the SARFAESI Act against one Muhmmad Waseem Ahmad and another. 3. Considering the fact that it is clearly well settled that an order passed under section 14 of the Act is also appellable before the DRT under section 17 of the Act, no good ground for interference is made out. 4. The present petition is dismissed with the liberty to prefer an appeal in accordance with law. 5. In case, the appeal is preferred and interim application is filed, the same shall be disposed off within a period of one week. September 12, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arjun Singh Kalhans, Amit Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Muhmmad Waseem Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) The Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Room No. 31 Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench