Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163841 (MAD)

S.M.V.MANOHAR v. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSSIONER

WP(MD)/23946/2017 · 2025-08-08

A D Maria Clete

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD).No.23946 of 2017 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.08.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE W.P.(MD).No.23946 of 2017 S. M.V. Manohar, S/o S.M. Velayutham, 18-13-1, Gurunathan Chettiar Street, Madurai main road, Usilampatti post, Madurai District - 625 532. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Transport Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai -600 005. 2.The Accountant General, Anna salai,Chennai. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ or Order or Direction particularly a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records passed by the first respondent herein Proc.R.No.41845/VA2/2009 dated 21.02.2017 quash the same and and conquently direct the second respondent herein to re-fix the pension by including the period from 12.08.2009 to 31.10.2011 also as net qualifying service while re-fixing the pension with all consequential, service and monetary benefits including the arrears of pension and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD).No.23946 of 2017 APPEARANCE OF PARTIES: For petitioner : M/s.M.Padmavathy, Advocate for Mr.L.Shaji Chellan, Advocate For Respondents : Mr.J.Ashok Additional Government Pleader for R1 : Mr.P.Gunasekaran, ACGSC, for R2 JUDGMENT When the matter was taken up for hearing on 01.08.2025, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had passed away and his wife also pre-deceased him and sought time to communicate with the existing Legal Representative of the petitioner. Hence, the matter is to be listed on 08.08.2025 “for taking steps”. Today (ie.08.08.2025), when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that she was not able to communicate with the legal representative of the petitioner. Since the petitioner has passed away and no steps were taken till date to substitute his legal heirs of the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. 08.08.2025 Neutral Case Citation: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No LS 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD).No.23946 of 2017 Copy to : 1. The Transport Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai -600 005. 2.The Accountant General, Anna salai, Chennai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD).No.23946 of 2017 DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE,J. LS Judgment made in W.P.(MD).No.23946 of 2017 08.08.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis