- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21273 WP NO.4658 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.4658 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. RAMANJINAPPA S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/O KONAGHATTA VILLAGE AND POST, KASABA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 163. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANIKETHANA K.M., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VARAPRASAD K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, JILLADALITHA BHAVANA, 1ST FLOOR, BEERASANDRA VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. SRI. KRISHNAPPA, Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21273 WP NO.4658 OF 2025 4. S/O MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O KONAGHATTA VILLAGE AND POST, KASABA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 163. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE MUTATION BEARING M.R.NO.12/2000-01 IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY VIDE ANNEXURE-G; ORDER DATED 11TH APRIL, 2019 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN REVISION PETITION NO.88/2017 VIDE ANNEXURE-P; AND ORDER DATED 09TH JUNE, 2017 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN CASE NO.R.A.(DO)/95/2011-12 VIDE ANNEXURE-L; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Smt. Navya Shekhar, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 to 3. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 11th April, 2019 (Annexure-P) passed by the respondent No.1 in Revision Petition No.88/2017 and order - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21273 WP NO.4658 OF 2025 dated 09th June, 2017 (Annexure-L) passed by the respondent No.2 in case No.R.A.(DO)95/2011-12. 3. Heard Sri. Anikethana K.M., learned counsel on behalf of Sri. Varaprasad K., appearing for the petitioner and Smt. Navya Shekhar, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 to 3. 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the writ petition, the same would indicate that the petitioner has challenged the impugned orders after a lapse of five years. It is also clear that, the petitioner has not shown a sufficient cause to condone the delay in challenging the impugned orders produced at Annexures 'P' and 'L'. Therefore, I am of the view that, no interference be called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39