HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6609/2025 1. Kamlesh S/o Shri Gangu Ram Saini, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Dhani Gumansingh, Patwar Halka Dhani Gumansingh Tehsil Khandela District Sikar (Raj.). 2. Bholaram S/o Shri Kalu Ram Saini, Aged About 64 Years, Resident Of Dhani Gumansingh, Patwar Halka Dhani Gumansingh Tehsil Khandela District Sikar (Raj.). 3. Bhagirath Mal S/o Shri Banwari Lal, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Dhani Gumansingh, Patwar Halka Dhani Gumansingh Tehsil Khandela District Sikar (Raj.). 4. Bhudaram S/o Shri Bhura Ram Saini, Aged About 72 Years, Resident Of Dhani Gumansingh, Patwar Halka Dhani Gumansingh Tehsil Khandela District Sikar (Raj.). 5. Shankar Lal S/o Shri Dholaram, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of Dhani Gumansingh, Patwar Halka Dhani Gumansingh Tehsil Khandela District Sikar (Raj.). 6. Bhanuram S/o Shri Manaram Saini, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of Dhani Gumansingh, Patwar Halka Dhani Gumansingh Tehsil Khandela District Sikar (Raj.). 7. Ramavatar S/o Shri Prabhat Ram Saini, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Dhani Gumansingh, Patwar Halka Dhani Gumansingh Tehsil Khandela District Sikar (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Sikar. 3. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Khandela Sikar District Sikar. (2 of 3) [CW-6609/2025] 4. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Khandela District Sikar. 5. The Secretary, Gram Panchayat Dhani Gumansingh, Patwar Halka Dhani Gumansingh Tehsil Khandela District Sikar (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Santosh Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 02/05/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that before approaching this Court, the petitioners approached the respondents by way of filing a representation for redressal of their grievances, but for the reasons best known to the authority, the representation submitted by the petitioners has not been decided. 2. Learned counsel further submits that the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Pawan Meena Versus State of Rajasthan (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024 decided on 02.02.2024) has directed all the Departments of the State to decide the representation within a stipulated time, but inspite of passing of the said order, till date, the representation submitted by the petitioners has not been decided. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition stands (3 of 3) [CW-6609/2025] disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide the representation (pending, if any) expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 5. The stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 6. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any direction/order to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/7