Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16382 (ALL)

VIPIN v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/4268/2025 · 2025-02-26

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:27913 Court No. - 84 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4268 of 2025 Applicant :- Vipin Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Shukla, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri R.K. Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.175 of 2024, under Sections 2/3 of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station Rajawali, District Firozabad. 3. The gang chart mentions involvement of the applicant in five cases, in which he has been granted bail. The applicant is involved in seven other cases in all of which he has been enlarged on bail. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 4. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 5. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 28.09.2024 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 6. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 7. Let the applicant-Vipin be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 27.2.2025 Ram. Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad