AMAR TRADERS PRIVATE LIMITED THRU.PROPRIETOR SRI B.P.SINGH v. AUTHORITY PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT 1936 AND ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER,AMETHI AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/8892/2025 · 2025-09-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163814 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163814 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8892 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State-respondent(s) and perused the material available on record.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging an order dated 29.01.2025 passed by the prescribed authority under the Payment of Wages Act.
3. Learned Standing Counsel, states that against the said order, an appeal is prescribed under Section 17 of the Payment of Wages Act.
4. Upholding the said objection, the petition is dismissed with a liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal, if so advised, in accordance with law. In case, the appeal is filed within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be entertained without any objection to the delay on merits. September 10, 2025 Praveen Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harendra Singh, Dileep Kumar Pathak, Satish Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Amar Traders Private Limited Thru.Proprietor Sri B.P.Singh .....Petitioner(s) Authority Payment Of Wages Act 1936 And Assistant Labour Commissioner,Amethi And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench