HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9021 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Sri Ankit Barnwal, the counsel for the petitioner and Sri Akash Deep Srivastava the counsel for the respondent bank. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the action of the respondent bank in proceeding to recover the dues, contrary to the provisions of the Rules. The petitioner had approached the DRT and file a SA No.624 of 2025. In the said SA, two IAs were also filed seeking stay with regard to taking physical possession. On the said application, an order was passed on 04.08.2025 directing the matter to be listed on 03.03.2026 for hearing. Liberty was also given to the petitioner to move urgency application, if the situation arise. 3. It is stated that as, the respondents were threatening to take over the physical possession, an application was filed for early hearing which was taken up on 19.08.2025 and was adjourned to 29.12.2025 on account of lack of time. 5. It is argued that on the one hand, the respondents are threatening to take physical possession and on the other hand, the application for interim relief is not being decided by the DRT. 6. Considering the material on record, the present petition is disposed off with direction to decide the interim relief application filed by the petitioner in SA No.624 of 2025 with all expedition in accordance with Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gulshan Mohla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Akash Deep Srivastava, C.S.C. Sri Vijay Kumar Maurya And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lko. University Rd, Thru. Registrar And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) law preferably within a period of four weeks from today. 7. Till the decision on the interim relief application, no coercive measures shall be taken against the petitioner for dispossession. September 15, 2025 VNP/- WRIC No. 9021 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench