Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163784 (ALL)

BADLU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DIST. MAJESTRATE BARABANKI DIST. BARABANKI AND 3 OTHERS

A227/5455/2025 · 2025-09-15

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5455 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. The present petition has been filed challenging an ex-parte decree dated 03.04.2024, passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ram Sanehi Ghat, District- Barabanki. 2. Considering that the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) specifies a remedy against an ex-parte judgment, no interference is called for under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. The petitioner is at liberty to avail such legal remedies as may be advised. 4. The petition is accordingly disposed of. September 15, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ram Karan Yadav (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Badlu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Dist. Majestrate Barabanki Dist. Barabanki And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench