HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8978 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent(s) and perused the material available on record. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging an order dated 21.10.2024, whereby, the request of the petitioners for accepting offer of declaring a particular piece of land in excess of the ceiling limits was not considered. 3. Learned Standing Counsel, states that an appeal is prescribed against the said order under Section 13 of the Ceiling Act. 4. Without going into the merits of the claim of the petitioners at this stage, the petitioners are relegated to prefer an appeal, in accordance with law. 5. In case, the appeal is filed within the period of four weeks from today, the same shall be entertained on merits and shall not be dismissed on the ground of limitation. 6. Petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations. September 12, 2025 Praveen Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Madan Gopal Tripathi, Atma Ram Verma, Ramesh Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Amar Pal Singh And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Sectt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench