HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10476 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 4. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.2 i.e. Director of Education, Secondary Education U.P., Lucknow which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.2 then the respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. September 9, 2025 J. K. Dinkar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Abdul Moin,J.) Shambhu Nath Verma .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench