APHC010216802016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 45755/2016 Between: 1. P VIJAYA KUMAR, SPSR NELLORE DIST, S/O JACOB, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC: UNEMPLOYEE, R/O. D. NO. B-10- 135,GANDHI. NAGAR, UUCHIREDDY PALEM VILLAGE 8E, MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECY EDUCATION DEPT GUNTUR DIST 5 OTHERS, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE HEAD MISTRESS, B.B.Z.P. GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL, BUTCHIREDDY PALEM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. DR BRIJITHA, W/O LATE DR. PRATAP RAVI KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, KODUR, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS pleased to declare the action of the 3rd respondent in retiring my sister from service as School Assistant vide Proc.Rc.No.6581/A3/2016 dated 16.09.2016 even though she is suffering with mental disorder and without conducting proper enquiry is illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and with a consequential direction to the 1st & 2nd respondent to conduct a detail enquiry with regard to the voluntary retirement proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent in Proc.Rc.No.6581/A3/2016 dated 16.09.2016 and till then not to release the retirement benefits IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 56385 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st & 2nd respondent to conduct a detail enquiry with regard to the voluntary retirement proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent in Proc.Rc.No.6581/A3/2016 dated 16.09.2016 and till then not to rclease the retirement benefits of my sister Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAVINDER ALKUCHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) 2. T JANARDHAN RAO 3 The Court made the following ORDER: On 07.08.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Thus, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite the same, there is no appearance for the petitioner. 2. Sri V. Aidinarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education appearing for the respondents is present. 3. In view of the continuous absence of the petitioner, it appears that the petitioner is not evincing any interest to prosecute the case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 01.09.2025 BSM 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.45755 of 2016 Date: 01.09.2025 BSM 5