Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163754 (ALL)

SMT. VINDANA AND ANOTHER v. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION ) SOUTH DISTT. UNNAO AND 4 OTHERS

A227/5689/2025 · 2025-09-24

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5689 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that there are typographical errors in the petition which needs to be corrected, hence, at this stage, it is prayed that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh with proper and correct pleadings. 2. In view of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 3. In case, if the petitioner moves an application for return of certified copies, the office shall do the needful within three days. September 24, 2025 Rakesh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Kumar, Ayush Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Smt. Vindana And Another .....Petitioner(s) Civil Judge (Junior Division ) South Distt. Unnao And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench