HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8562 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Mr. Himanshu Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Madhukar Ojha, learned State Counsel. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed the following relief(s): "(A) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent police authorities not to unnecessarily harass the petitioner and his family members in any manner, in the interest of justice. (B) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to consider and decide the representation/application of the petitioner dated 01.09.2025 within a fixed period of time." 3. Learned A.G.A. has shown instructions letter dated 10.09.2025 provided by Sub Inspector, Police Station- Inhauna, District- Amethi, which is taken on record. 4. Learned A.G.A. has drawn attention of this Court towards Annexure No. 5, which is an order dated 12.07.2024 passed by this Court in CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 4773 of 2024 (Maruph Ahmad Vs. State of U. P. and Others) wherein almost similar relief was prayed Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Himanshu Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Maroof Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) and this Court, on the basis of instructions, disposed of that writ petition, giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority, if he is harassed. 5. Learned A.G.A. has further submitted that since the wife of the petitioner has lodged F.I.R. against some persons so the police has initiated the required exercise under Section 126/132 BNSS. Not only the above, the wife of the petitioner again lodged an F.I.R. under Section 75 BNS and Section 7/8 POCSO wherein the investigation is pending. It is stated that allegation levelled in the present writ petition are false and misconceived and this writ petition has been filed on account of Peshbandi. 6. Be that as it may, considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the aforesaid instructions letter, we do not find any good ground to keep this petition pending any longer, therefore, this writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage, giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent court, if he feels aggrieved. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. September 22, 2025 (Manoj K.) CRLP No. 8562 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench