Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163741 (ALL)

RAM KARAN CHAUBE v. BOARD OF REVENUE, UP, LUCKNOW THRU. MEMBER AND OTHERS

A227/5430/2025 · 2025-09-10

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5430 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow to decide the Misc. Application No.288 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.R2024030500288) "Ramkaran Chaube and others vs. Katori Devi", under Section 202 U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, which is pending since 24.01.2024, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow considers and decides the aforesaid Misc. Application in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach the court/ authority concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of the Misc. Application No.288 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.R2024030500288) "Ramkaran Chaube and others vs. Katori Devi", Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Adarsh Singh, Anvita Rai, Nikhil Kumar, Shubham Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Karan Chaube .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, Up, Lucknow Thru. Member And Others .....Respondent(s) under Section 202 U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the court/authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioners, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. September 10, 2025 KR A227 No. 5430 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench