SACHIN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1213/2025 · 2025-09-09
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163734 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163734 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1213 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State as well as Shri Krishna Mahi, learned counsel for the complainant who undertakes to file vakalatnama during course of the day.
2. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has already been granted protection against arrest by order dated 12.03.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 1935 of 2025, Sachin Kumar vs. State of U.P. and Others.
3. It is further submitted that the aforesaid writ petition is still pending, and the said order continues to remain in force. Hence, there is no apprehension of arrest.
4. In light of the above and considering that an interim order in favour of the applicant is already in operation, as reflected in Annexure No. 6, there appears to be no apprehension of arrest at this stage.
5. Accordingly, the present application, being devoid of merit, is dismissed. However, liberty is reserved to the applicant to approach this Court again, if circumstances so warrant. September 9, 2025/R.C. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Virendra Patel, Arun Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Sachin Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench