Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16373 (AP)

N Ramanayya, v. .The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/11823/2025 · 2025-07-16

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p APHC010216622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY.THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 11823 OF 2025 Between; N. Ramanayya, S/o Late Sri N.Maddi Reddy, Aged about 45 years, R/o D.No. 1/14, Krishnagiri Banaganapalle Village and Mandal Nandyal District Andhra Pradesh. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District-522001 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dhone, Nandyal District, AP 3. The Tahsildar, Banaganapalle (V) and (M) Nandyal District, AP ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 and 3 in not representation dt. 16.04.2025 of the petitioner for considering the appointment as F.P. Shop Dealer on compassionate grounds in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.4 dt.28-02-2014 as being illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the settled judgments of this Hon'ble Court and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation dt. 16.04.2025 of the petitioner for appointment as F.P. Shop Dealer. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 ■ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to representation Shop Dealer on direct the respondents no.2 and 3 to consider the dt.16.04.2025 of the petitioner for appointment as F.P. compassionate grounds pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. THOTA SUNEETHA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: APHC010216622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 11823/2025 Between: 1.N RAMANAYYA, S/0.LATE SRI N.MADDI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/0 D.NO. 1/14, KRISHNAGIRI BANAGANAPALLE VILLAGE AND MANDAL NANDYAL DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL CIVIL DEPARTMENT AMARAVATI, SUPPLIES SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522001 SECRETARY 2.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DHONE, NANDYAL DISTRICT, AP 3.THE TAHSILDAR, BANAGANAPALLE (V) AND (M) NANDYAL DISTRICT, AP ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 and 3 in not considering the representation dt. 16.04.2025 of the petitioner for appointment as F.P. Shop Dealer on compassionate grounds in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.4 dt.28-02- 2014 as being illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the settled judgments of this Hon'ble Court and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation dt. 16.04.2025 of the petitioner for appointment as F.P. Shop Dealer. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court 2 may be pleased to direct the respondents no.2 and 3 to consider the representation dt.16.04.2025 of the petitioner for appointment as F.P. Shop Dealer on compassionate grounds pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.THOTASUNEETHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following; e- THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO. 11823 of 2025 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive. The said submission is placed on record. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. Sd/- U. SRSDEV! ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ¥*• //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to M/s.Thota Suneetha, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Two CCs to GP for Civil Supplies, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED; 17/07/2025 ORDER WP No.11823 OF 2025 I OS SEP 2025 s ^ ^ Current seciton . DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS