Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163727 (ALL)

HAPPU VERMA ALIAS KAMTA PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 10 OTHERS

WPIL/967/2025 · 2025-09-17

Pankaj Bhatia

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 967 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Nagendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for respondent Nos.7 to 11. 2. The present petition has been filed as a PIL seeking demolition of the alleged constructions raised by respondent Nos.7 to 11. 3. Shri Nagendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.7 to 11 states that an FIR was lodged at the instance of respondent No.8 against the PIL petitioner. 4. The said fact has not been disclosed by the petitioner. Clearly, it is misuse of the PIL. 5. The petition stands dismissed with a cost of Rs.5,000/- on the petitioner. 6. The said cost shall be deposited by the petitioner before the District Magistrate within a period of four weeks, failing which, the same shall be recovered as arrears of land revenue. Thereafter, the cost shall be paid by the District Magistrate to respondent No.8. September 17, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Garima Singh, Harshit Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Happu Verma Alias Kamta Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench