( 2025:JHHC:17056 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5097 of 2025 ------ Bimal Yadav @ Ganesh Yadav @ Vimal Yadav, aged about 52 years, S/o Late Musafir Yadav, R/o At –Jamuniya, P.O. – Dakshani Umga, P.S. –Madanpur, District –Aurangabad, Bihar. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 25.06.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Chhattarpur P.S. Case No.12 of 2018 corresponding to G.R. No. 244 of 2018, S.T. No. 53 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 347, 323, 327, 307, 385, 387, 427, 504 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 17 of the CLA Act and under Section 10, 13, 16, 20 & 23 of the U.A.P. ACt. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the member of a Maoist organization attempted to murder the informant others and burnt the J.C.B. Machine. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has not been put on Test Identification Parade though he was not arrested from the place of occurrence. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.03.2018, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 25 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Palamau, in connection with Chhattarpur P.S. Case No.12 of 2018 corresponding to G.R. No. 244 of 2018, S.T. No. 53 of 2021 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/