HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10494 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to decide petitioner's claim regarding payment of final pension and gratuity in view of the fact that petitioner has superannuated in the year 2016. 3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 2 i.e. Chairman Board of Revenue Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. In case petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid benefits, actual payment thereof shall be ensured within a period of six weeks thereafter. 4. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 9, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girish Kumar Pandey, R. R. Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Kamalapati Dixit .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench